Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <426EDFD8.2F244F24@dessent.net> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:42:00 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Any fix to cygheap_fixup_in_child failure after rebaseall? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Bruce Dobrin wrote: > OK, that seems to have worked. I've only used it alone or rebase for > specific files before. I generated a file from a find of all dll's > under /usr and /lib ( then removed the cygwin1.dll from the list). Can > I assume the redundancy of hitting most of these 2 times will not have > any adverse effect? With all the stuff I compile on this machine I'm > not sure how else to find them otherwise... That's not how you use it. rebaseall already knows where to find all installed DLLs. The only time you should ever use -T is to supply it with *extra* DLLs that you have installed outside of setup.exe. Though it looks like it will work okay your way, since it will just rebase those DLLs a second time, but it's ugly. You could avoid the double rebasing by either a) adding a "sort -u" to rebaseall after it has merged the two file lists, or b) skip rebaseall and call rebase directly with your filelist. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/