Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <426B1A30.F99D6478@dessent.net> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:01:52 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: possible DLL license violations References: <42691DCE.5040809@acm.org> <42693AE5.4040305@acm.org> <42699DB0.60404@acm.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050423153212.087f16e0@pop.prospeed.net> <95a883060504231828afd0db8@mail.gmail.com> <426AFD88.FD0285FD@dessent.net> <20050424032009.GA20096@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>anyone else's. I only chime in because as best I understand it, once > >>having found a violator the rights holder must act to protect said > >>rights; failing to do so may be construed as similar to consent. > > > >That applies only to trademarks, not copyright or patents. > > I was informed by Red Hat counsel that it was important to protect > copyrights, too. In that case... IANALATEIHSMBSI. (Replace 'You' with 'I' in http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#YANALATEYHSMBSI ) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/