Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:39:12 -0800 From: Richard Henderson To: Andrew Pinski Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Cygwin , Danny Smith , mingw-dvlpr Subject: Re: stdcall lib functions with exception throwing callbacks vs Dwarf2 EH Message-ID: <20041124193912.GA6000@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Andrew Pinski , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Cygwin , Danny Smith , mingw-dvlpr References: <001701c4d1ab$949322e0$0a6d65da@DANNY> <20041124003240.GA6028@redhat.com> <000401c4d1fd$112d9eb0$8c4861cb@DANNY> <20041124184427.GA5485@redhat.com> <01EEC13D-3E4B-11D9-941D-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01EEC13D-3E4B-11D9-941D-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:59:46PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Could this be related to PR 17220? I wouldn't think so. My patch *should* only have any affect when stdcall functions are involved. (Well, that's not quite true -- the output may be a bit more compact, since I reduced the number of DW_CFA_GNU_args_size bits emitted, but the same information should be present.) r~ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/