Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:11:49 -0800
From: Roger Pryor <rpryor@pryor-and-pryor.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Newbie question regarding tcsetattr
Message-Id: <20041122101149.4f655703.rpryor@pryor-and-pryor.com>
In-Reply-To: <20041122155224.GA31161@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <20041119131523.58dd206d.rpryor@pryor-and-pryor.com> <20041122071247.4fbbe9e3.rpryor@pryor-and-pryor.com> <20041122155224.GA31161@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Organization: Pryor and Pryor Inc.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:52:24 -0500
Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com> wrote:
> >
> >This seems to have dropped into a black hole, does anyone know what is
> >the status of tcsetattr w.r.t serial ports?
> 
> Possibly the reason this "dropped into a black hole" is that you used
> the word "newbie" in the subject, you didn't follow the reporting
> guidelines at http://cygwin.com/problems.html, and while you did provide
> a code snippet showing what you meant, you did not provide a simple,
> compilable test case illustrating your problem.  For something like
> serial I/O, it's unlikely that anyone is going to want to hack together
> their own test case to confirm or deny your theory that setting the baud
> rate is broken.
> 
> cgf

Thank you.

Actually I was asking if there is any known problem, I was not asking
someone to run any tests.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Pryor

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/