Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:28:31 +0200 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere Message-ID: <961849581086.20040825202831@familiehaase.de> To: "Krzysztof Duleba" CC: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Release candidate: gcc-3.4.1-1 In-Reply-To: <05d701c48ace$cddbb2c0$0e00a8c0@duli2> References: <05d701c48ace$cddbb2c0$0e00a8c0@duli2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Krzysztof schrieb: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >> > Is this true? I have 3.3.1 libraries in /lib and >> > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1, but 2.95 libraries only in >> > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10. >> >> There was no libjava with 2.x compilers. There was no libobjc with 2.x >> compilers. What about libstdc++? > As I said, 2.95 holds all its libraries, including libstdc++, in > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10. Interesting, I would be interested why the previous maintainer switched to unversioned runtime libs. >> Hmmm, I don't like maintaining two versions of a package, if 3.4 is >> stable it will be the one and only current version. > I'm aware of it and that's why I'm asking. That would be the final release > of 3.3, able to coexist with 3.4. Then you could happily forget about 3.3. This is an option. I'll think about it. > This would make no sense if 3.4 is binary compatible with 3.3. Are > differences between 3.3 and 3.4 significant? At least C++ has improved much and is not compatible (you cannot use one libstdc++ for both versions. Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/