Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <40B5BD6B.63A9DFD7@dessent.net>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 03:05:31 -0700
From: Brian Dessent <brian@dessent.net>
Organization: My own little world...
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Looking for new apache maintainer
References: <20040525234836.GA2243@coe.bosbc.com> <40B53400.668ECCEF@dessent.net> <000b01c443cb$c6c0e950$78d96f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk> <40B5B751.9EB8E456@dessent.net> <001101c443d0$dee51470$78d96f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

Max Bowsher wrote:

> > I hadn't planned to package 2.x because its native win32 version would
> > be significantly faster with a thread MPM than a Cygwin port.  But I
> > suppose a Cygwin version would be useful if you wanted to test or
> > develop things that are destined for a 2.x/Unix machine.  I also don't
> > know what's involved with compiling 2.x for Cygwin.  Maybe after 1.x and
> > the modules are out...
> 
> OK, my reason for asking was because I currently have apr and apr-util
> packages pending, so if anyone was to package Apache 2, I'd need to
> co-ordinate with them. I have actually got a working cygwin apache 2 to
> compile, but it was quite messy, and I have no time to tidy it up at the
> moment.

Ah, of course.  I'll contact you before I start packaging 2.x, if ever.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/