Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, codegen SSE & alignement issues In-Reply-To: <4090E9C6.6040003@ompf.org> To: gcc@ompf.org Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:01:41 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Ross Ridge , cygwin@cygwin.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20040429150141.92534A8560@perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> From: rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) > I see. It's much more reasonable. Tho i find rather strange that gcc > doesn't put those in a special section and implicitely asks for a 16 > bytes alignement for all constants (when it's only really needed for > some specific target optimizations), but that's just my armchair expert > opinion. GCC does ask for 16-byte alignment for the SSE constants, but the request isn't honoured by binutils. Ross Ridge -- l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU [oo][oo] rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca -()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/u/rridge/ db // -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/