Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: okiddle@yahoo.co.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-22.tower-36.messagelabs.com!1080810641!5097910
X-StarScan-Version: 5.2.10; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [158.234.9.163]
Cc: zzapper <david@tvis.co.uk>, zsh-workers@sunsite.dk, cygwin@cygwin.com
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-StarScan-Version: 5.0.7; banners=.,-,-
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0403310935450.9892@gremlin.fruitbat.org>
From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <s38u10erwrz.fsf@ackusativ.ling.uu.se> <1vvf60l9i7n4nlobcroik2le5ofe6v2rn4@4ax.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0403291441160.5939@gremlin.fruitbat.org> <3372.1080639122@trentino.logica.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0403301047250.5939@gremlin.fruitbat.org> <2603.1080737128@trentino.logica.co.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0403310935450.9892@gremlin.fruitbat.org>
To: "Peter A. Castro" <doctor@fruitbat.org>
Subject: Re: zsh and line breaks
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:09:56 +0200
Message-ID: <25057.1080810596@trentino.logica.co.uk>

"Peter A. Castro" wrote:
> > It is easy for us to add `#ifdef __CYGWIN__' around changes or #define
> > O_TEXT to zero on other systems so if you do correct the problem,
> > please send the changes back to us.
> 
> There are about 43 open() calls which I've updated with the O_TEXT
> option.  Having all those ifdef's seemed rather ugly (makes the code hard
> to look at, expectially when they are within a few lines of each other)
> so I took a more "elegent" approach, though you may want to revise it if
> it doesn't meet your style requirements :)

I can believe that adding ifdef's to all is ugly. That's what I meant
by "#define O_TEXT to zero on other systems" - just one thought on a
possible more "elegant" approach.

> Yep, I'm experimenting with this right now.  As it stands, tests which
> print out to a file and then cat it back in (currently A04redirect and
> E01options) produce a diff, but don't otherwise seem to have any
> problems.

Are the diffs just the line endings? From what I understand, the
reported problems were with text files used as input to the shell (i.e.
scripts, sourced files, autoloaded functions and stdin). Quite whether
it is also right for redirected output, I wouldn't know.

Oliver

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

