Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Reply-To: Cygwin List <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040325104702.03b5a8a0@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: 
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:48:03 -0500
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: RE: 1.5.5.1 posix conformance for sigaction()
Cc: gshyam@denver.india.mentorg.com, harsh_arora@mentorg.com
In-Reply-To: <20040325150802.GA4123@redhat.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10403251336200.4671-100000@denver.india.mentorg.com> <20040325150802.GA4123@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 10:08 AM 3/25/2004, you wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:37:24PM +0000, Ghanshyam wrote:
>>Thanks for your attention. But I found the second result (two SIGCHLD) in
>>both the cases. I m using the cygwin version 1.5.5.1 
>
>Given that the current version of cygwin is 1.5.10, does that possibly

                                             ^^^^^^^
                                 should read 1.5.9 (soon to be followed
                                                    by 1.5.10 ;-) )

>suggest something to you?

--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

