Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Spam-Filter: check_local@alphatech.com 4.4(020923:1754) http://digitalanswers.org/
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
Subject: Re: cygwin without Win32
Reply-To: sds@gnu.org
X-Attribution: Sam
X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me.
From: Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org>
Organization: disorganization
References: <NUTMEGJpaZQy0etsPAt0000015a@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <Pine.GSO.4.56.0401200822300.14918@slinky.cs.nyu.edu> <20040120171336.GB25428@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:44:38 -0500
Message-ID: <uk73mpla1.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt)
In-Reply-To: <20040120171336.GB25428@redhat.com> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:13:36 -0500")
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Posted-To: gmane.os.cygwin

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.os.cygwin as well.

> * Christopher Faylor <pts-ab-crefbany-ercyl-cyrnfr@pltjva.pbz> [2004-01-20 12:13:36 -0500]:
>
>>> > I wonder how close to an approximation of reality a simple
>>> > poll/form on the  cygwin.com front page would generate?
>>>
>>>   I wonder if running a script across the list archive to extract
>>> all the cycheck output and counting the different systems that way
>>> would produce a result with any meaning to it at all?
>>
>>Perhaps only which systems have more problems (or which systems have more
>>consciencious users that actually read <http://cygwin.com/problems.html>).
>
> I guess I'll keep making the observation that any poll would be
> worthless as long as people seem to be ignoring that fact and still
> coming up with alternate ways of polling.

download count for setup.exe should be a reliable statistics.

> We are not dropping support for older Windows systems.

how about the following maintenance nightmare: detect SFU at configure
time and use them as detected, then distribute two versions:
traditional win32 for older systems and SFU-based for NT-derivatives.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.honestreporting.com>
If abortion is murder, then oral sex is cannibalism.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

