Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Sam Steingold Subject: Re: bug in statfs Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:58:00 -0500 Organization: disorganization Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <6.0.1.1.0.20031203122259.03524a88@127.0.0.1> Reply-To: sds@gnu.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5vnQzwZY65ptZL0pFcgovF/Eb30= > * Larry Hall [2003-12-03 12:23:52 -0500]: > > At 12:03 PM 12/3/2003, Sam Steingold you wrote: >>POSIX specifies struct statfs to contain slots f_frsize, f_flag, >>f_favail, and f_namemax and to be declared in : >> >> >>Cygwin defines struct statfs without slots f_frsize, f_flag, and >>f_favail, and with f_namelen instead of f_namemax, in sys/vfs.h (also >>included from sys/statfs.h) and does not come with sys/statvfs.h. Actually, the correct way to state the issue is: Cygwin implements obsolete calls (f)statfs() instead of the POSIX calls (f)statvfs(). > I haven't heard of anyone suggesting that they were creating a patch > for this. Perhaps you want to try? I wish I had time for this too... -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/