Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:21:00 -0800
From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna@efn.org>
To: "Randy W. Sims" <RandyS@ThePierianSpring.org>
Cc: Nick Ing-Simmons <nick.ing-simmons@elixent.com>, cygwin@cygwin.com,
   perl5-porters@perl.org, module-build-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Module::Build] Re: Cwd::cwd() bug??? on Cygwin
Message-ID: <20031121212059.GA2236@efn.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna@efn.org>,
	"Randy W. Sims" <RandyS@ThePierianSpring.org>,
	Nick Ing-Simmons <nick.ing-simmons@elixent.com>, cygwin@cygwin.com,
	perl5-porters@perl.org, module-build-general@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <3FAF853D.4000202@urth.org> <3FB00F47.10400@ThePierianSpring.org> <3FB0ACC8.6030402@urth.org> <3FB30BB3.10405@ThePierianSpring.org> <3FB50640.2010908@urth.org> <3FB55A73.5060806@ThePierianSpring.org> <3FB64CB5.4060802@ThePierianSpring.org> <3FBD695A.9020307@ThePierianSpring.org> <20031121110334.3098.7@llama.elixent.com> <3FBDF54F.2080808@ThePierianSpring.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3FBDF54F.2080808@ThePierianSpring.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Organization: bs"d

On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 06:21:51AM -0500, "Randy W. Sims" <RandyS@ThePierianSpring.org> wrote:
> >>># test.pl
> >>>package MyModule;
> >>>use Module;
> >>>use base 'Module';
> >>>use Cwd;
> >
> >
> >If you moved that above the use Module line then when Module.pm 
> >was compiled it would know Cwd::cwd was a function.
> 
> Tried that too. Removing it does work though, but that's not a solution; 
> it's not reasonable to tell clients that subclass your library not to 
> 'use Cwd'.

If your class provides a method foo(), it is reasonable to tell those who
subclass that defining a sub foo or importing one from elsewhere
into their class will override the base method foo().   

> I'm having a hard time grasping the order in which perl is interpreting 
> this. What is desired is that $p->cwd() call Module::cwd() which should 
> then forward the call to Cwd::cwd(). But no matter how I rearrange 
> things I can't coax the behavior I want.
> 
> I'm missing something simple here; I know it...

use Cwd (); ??

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

