Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3? From: Robert Collins To: Brian Ford Cc: Brian P Kasper , cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: References: <1068761532.1109.60.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7/pSWSvI8lWhaacanOOM" Message-Id: <1068762514.1109.65.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:28:34 +1100 --=-7/pSWSvI8lWhaacanOOM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 09:26, Brian Ford wrote: > > Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target > > version*. > > > I didn't think version specific dependencies would be needed here. I'm > obviously not well versed in setup, but I thought that replacing the old > monolithic gcc package with an empty one and ajdusting that empty one's > dependencies to require the new equivalent packages would have done the > trick. I guess I was wrong here? No, that will work. I'd say that hasn't been done though. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-7/pSWSvI8lWhaacanOOM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQA/tAWSI5+kQ8LJcoIRAttbAJip9gDXyfR+FRfWGDeUhy9V5Oy/AJ9Cqs9o /gUPF4aCEdKCf0634neTTA== =gYld -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7/pSWSvI8lWhaacanOOM--