Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3? From: Robert Collins To: Brian Ford Cc: Brian P Kasper , cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bsvE+INYRlALNZD9cUpd" Message-Id: <1068761532.1109.60.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:12:12 +1100 --=-bsvE+INYRlALNZD9cUpd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote: > However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating > to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency > bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++. What did you put in the setup.hint that makes you think setup would do version specific dependencies for the *old version* ? Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target version*. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-bsvE+INYRlALNZD9cUpd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/tAG8I5+kQ8LJcoIRAgrSAJ93j8ci+43d635hl0xORI1FaQcFBgCg0hsK +omC/poTV/0feRyqDACwe2k= =6yS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bsvE+INYRlALNZD9cUpd--