Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Joe Buehler Subject: Re: Building gcc on cygwin w/ Herman Ten Brugge's bounds checking patch Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:28:38 -0500 Organization: Spirent Communications, Inc. Lines: 22 Message-ID: <3FAFCAC6.5090601@hekimian.com> References: <20031108144026.41321.qmail@web20807.mail.yahoo.com> Reply-To: jbuehler@hekimian.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20031108144026.41321.qmail@web20807.mail.yahoo.com> Bill Priest wrote: > I've built gcc w/ the bounds checking patch on Linux > and solaris and am trying to build it on cygwin (w/ > the > cygwin modified source from setup). With tweak to > one file I've been able to get it to bootstrap w/o > any errors and the resulting C compiler will work > w/o specifying "-fbounds-checking". But I get a seg > fault when specifying "-fbounds-checking". Has anyone > been able to build gcc w/ this patch?? I'm sure the > problem is parts of the patch that don't apply cleanly > vs. the cygwin patches. I had downloaded this but not tried it yet. If you get it working it would be "interesting" to recompile Cygwin and all of its packages and see what happens. We have most of the core dumps out of our local Cygwin setup but there are still some happening from time to time... -- Joe Buehler -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/