Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:58:45 +0100 From: "Gerrit P. Haase" Reply-To: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <4623962140.20031104165845@familiehaase.de> To: Lapo Luchini CC: CygWin Subject: Re: C++ Compilers : Comparative Performance Testsuite In-Reply-To: <3FA7C328.7070801@lapo.it> References: <157-1772867639.20031030154714@familiehaase.de> <15820826718.20031104160630@familiehaase.de> <3FA7C328.7070801@lapo.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Hello Lapo, Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 4:18:00 PM, you wrote: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>Interesting, it is really a little faster when libstdc++ is directly >>compared with the STLport library. So it would make sense to use it when >>performance is an issue. >> >> > I guess it is smaller, too, the stdlibc++ not being shared. > (or it is, now? I forgot to check before clicking "send" ;) ) Unfortunately the shared STLport library doesn't work, at least in this case. -- Best regards, Gerrit -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/