Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <3F98BA80.7B42B53F@dessent.net> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:37:04 -0700 From: Brian Dessent Organization: My own little world... X-Accept-Language: en,en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_getline' References: <3D848382FB72E249812901444C6BDB1DE4DF10@exchange.timesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.linuxsv3.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cygwin.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dessent.net Note-from-DJ: This may be spam "Robb, Sam" wrote: > Grumble. Looking through the archives shows that > getline() isn't exported: > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-06/msg01328.html > > Can't understand how I missed this on my first search. > > cgf, et al - is there a reason why getline and getdelim > aren't exported, or is this just another example of good > ol' fashion Cygwin meanness? I think you're reading too much into the phrase "not exported." I parse it as meaning "does not exist in any form in Cygwin" whereas I think you're interpreting it as "code exists but symbol not made available for linking." I'll leave it to someone else to say with certainty but it appears from cgf's reponse that it's more the former than the latter. Brian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/