Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:15:15 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: cygwin-apps@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Why not which 2.16 instead of 1.5? Message-ID: <20030917081515.GY9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, cygwin-apps@cygwin.com References: <67FF6690.186B753A.0CE3B6DD@netscape.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <67FF6690.186B753A.0CE3B6DD@netscape.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i This question doesn't belong on cygwin-apps. Redirected to cygwin@cygwin.com. On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 02:01:56AM -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > Corinna, > > I believe you manage the which package, and if not, I hope the > appropriate party will read this. > > Why is cygwin still distributing which 1.5 when the GNU which listed at > Savannah points to which (now 2.16) hosted at: the which package shipped in the Cygwin distro is not GNU which. Therefore the version number do not correspond. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/