Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 21:11:23 -0700
To: Charles Wilson <cwilson@ece.gatech.edu>
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: basename() implementation?
Message-ID: <20030502041123.GA3261@triplehelix.org>
References: <20030501051325.GA16157@triplehelix.org> <3EB1EDFA.8070104@ece.gatech.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3EB1EDFA.8070104@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: joshk@triplehelix.org (Joshua Kwan)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-38.8 required=4.5
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 12:03:06AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> (2) there is a new feature in CVS binutils, where .exe's can have export=
=20
> tables.  (The currently released cygwin binutils doesn't have this, yet,=
=20
> but it'll come, eventually).  Anyway, once you build the .exe with the=20
> export table (using a .def file or __declspec(dllexport) decorators),=20
> you then use dlltool to create an import library (.dll.a) **for the=20
> .exe**.  Then, you build the DLL and link against that import lib.
>=20
> #2 is obviously more cutting edge, and I haven't tested it.  But it=20
> should work in principle.  There are some hooks in libtool-1.5 to=20
> support this mode, as well, but they haven't been tested (because it's=20
> dependent on a new binutils release).

Very cool! Which versions would these be so I can keep track of when I
should be able to try this out?

Regards,
Josh

--=20
New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+se/rT2bz5yevw+4RAkNmAJ9UJfH7b+Fx7qkN3bt/hSnaq8u3TwCgzixI
c2vD/J0LSvcoZanq6dAa/7g=
=Ob1H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--

