Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: setup.exe:  Woe is me!
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins@cygwin.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0304271521550.10996-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0304271521550.10996-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-knJxPr4WXayFaEUiipEc"
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1051492164.887.49.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 28 Apr 2003 11:09:24 +1000

--=-knJxPr4WXayFaEUiipEc
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 05:23, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:


> I don't know how much extra effort it'll be, but wouldn't a
> "log-on-the-spot" command-line option make sense anyway?  Or is that what
> you meant?

Actually, I just meant building setup with the extant patch to change
the logging behaviour.

A command line option we can include for releases would be neat. The
patch Max has just reposted would be a good basis for that..

Rob

--=20
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.

--=-knJxPr4WXayFaEUiipEc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+rH9EI5+kQ8LJcoIRAtkMAJ914zUlriizB3MhdZEwdnXcR7oZRQCgjKHF
CZpp/c9vrstbVzyY1eOgrOQ=
=ZWQD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-knJxPr4WXayFaEUiipEc--

