Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Cygwin - Versioned Distro's (was Re: A request?)
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins@cygwin.com>
To: Elfyn McBratney <elfyn-cygwin@exposure.org.uk>
Cc: cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
In-Reply-To: <02de01c3087f$913c68f0$ac7986d9@ellixia>
References: <768A0EA6FF8CB34FA522978966E5D52E021370A9@bwam02msx.ae.ge.com>
	 <20030417172623.GB12623@redhat.com>
	 <02de01c3087f$913c68f0$ac7986d9@ellixia>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+bTPLHnorYxj2KU+Nkq1"
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1050987478.842.46.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 22 Apr 2003 14:57:58 +1000

--=-+bTPLHnorYxj2KU+Nkq1
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 13:30, Elfyn McBratney wrote:


> using the cutting-edge in Cygwin then they'll just use the net release.
> Could also be the birth of CPM, too.

Control Program/Monitor?

> What we'd need:
>=20
> - A CVS repository
> - Part of the web site dedicated to the distribution
> - A Mailing list
> - Volunteers to handle bug reports, release updates &c
>=20
> I've put myself up, and Brian Ford raised interest.Anyone else?

Well I'm interested in seeing the result :}. And I'll happily accept
patches / even tweak the odd thing in setup to accomodate your needs. I
can't commit the time needed to do release testing or policy
documentation though.

You'll also need a setup program to install your 'stable distribution'.
(*)

Rob

(*) setup.exe can be reused, but you *will* need some changes to teach
it that there is a stable distribution, and the unstable distribution.
My thought on the prev / curr / test buttons has been to treat them like
distributions, but there was a lot of resistance when I suggested that.
So currently there is not separation between the three. IF there is
community support, I'm happy to have setup present 'stable' , 'curr' and
'testing/exp' and have an (optionally) hard barrier between stable and
curr.

Rob
--=20
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.

--=-+bTPLHnorYxj2KU+Nkq1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+pMvWI5+kQ8LJcoIRAjx/AJ0b41G9fnzFZw0IIMSVov6yNvE34ACfbjFG
NfEzbdx94lEnTtwc1zvnZqw=
=ndml
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-+bTPLHnorYxj2KU+Nkq1--

