Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:14:56 +0200 (MEST) From: "S. L." To: Jason Tishler Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20030415140103.GC3332@tishler.net> Subject: Re: rebase problem (was Re: Happy Birthday (late), cgf...) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated-Sender: #0006551723@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [194.102.244.61] Message-ID: <25271.1050491696@www3.gmx.net> X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Jason, It didn't "crash cygwin real good", let's better put it this way: it brought me in a mood I've considered my cygwin installation was crashed. Not much "technical" info to share. Actually, it happened because of (same old story) apache, apxs, mod_ssl, php and php_pg on win98. Apache itself and its modules could compile and run after rebasing the dlls. I was unable to bring up neither mod_ssl nor php /w php_pg. And this by either doing "massive" rebase (i.e. all dlls except cygwin1.dll) or just a "selective" one (just the dependecy dlls). Meanwhile pushing and pulling around original dlls. [...] I eventually solved the problem by compiling a shared_core apache version, which works without rebase, having those modules compiled in. But since all this took me a month or so, it left a bitter taste of defeat upon my relation with rebase (I still consider it a good tool, but I don't need it yet :^). SLao -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/