Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: RE: [CYGWIN] XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:33:50 +0100
Message-ID: <03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B83AF03E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk>
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Cygwin" <pgsql-cygwin@postgresql.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com] 
> Sent: 15 April 2003 21:07
> To: Cygwin
> Cc: Dave Page; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report
> 
> > Yes, XP Home had (and still has) reported problems.  But, I 
> don't have 
> > access to XP Home, so I cannot confirm or refute them.
> 
> Sorry but I don't quite understand that.  XP Home is the same 
> as XP Pro except for the user interface side and some minor 
> services. Especially the OS kernel is the same.  No missing 
> calls, no different behaviour.  From the Cygwin side of life, 
> both are the same.

I thought I heard there were differences in the way you could specify
the user account used by services (specifically you couldn't)? I've
never used Home so may be completely off-track, but as Jason implies,
judging by posts to the pgsql-cygwin list there is definately something
different between home and pro causing the problem on home that don't
exist with pro.

Regards, Dave.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/