Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: Robert Collins Cc: rainer.typke@cs.uu.nl, cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not select prev Organization: Jan at Appel From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 23:00:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1049834756.893.89.camel@localhost> (Robert Collins's message of "09 Apr 2003 06:45:56 +1000") Message-ID: <871y0caemi.fsf@peder.flower> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) References: <87n0j050ts.fsf@peder.flower> <1049834756.893.89.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Robert Collins writes: > Anyway, I still don't see what went wrong - the user selected tetex, and > got tetex. tetex-beta wasn't installed, and shouldn't have been. As I understand it, Rainer selected tetex-beta (because thought that must be newer), changed his mind, selected tetex instead. Then, tetex didn't work because neither of tetex-tiny/tetex-base got installed. Rainer, is that correct? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/