Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not select prev From: Robert Collins To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: <87n0j050ts.fsf@peder.flower> References: <87n0j050ts.fsf@peder.flower> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6BfGY+H+FTCaDRjm5mfW" Organization: Message-Id: <1049834756.893.89.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 09 Apr 2003 06:45:56 +1000 --=-6BfGY+H+FTCaDRjm5mfW Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 03:57, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Setup does not have a `conflicts:' afaik, but I don't see how that > should help? The new packages should get installed automagically > through the new `requires:' fields for the old packages. We have conflicts and replaces in setup.ini *now*, but we don't do anything with them. Patches gratefully....=20 Anyway, I still don't see what went wrong - the user selected tetex, and got tetex. tetex-beta wasn't installed, and shouldn't have been. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-6BfGY+H+FTCaDRjm5mfW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+kzUEI5+kQ8LJcoIRApelAJ41O4Ir4V+u7LbIv1x+qsotkVmc5gCgn00h OdtkxEHvsjqw9au6rlt7YBs= =zbM0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6BfGY+H+FTCaDRjm5mfW--