Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Originating-IP: [150.101.193.247] X-Originating-Email: [tilps@hotmail.com] From: "Gareth Pearce" To: "Nano-devel list" Cc: References: <20030405183018.GA27247@redhat.com> <20030406045233.B51013@samwise.astyanax.org> Subject: spell and nano (was reply to cgf about gpl violation) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:46:34 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2003 13:46:49.0273 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8D7D290:01C2FC42] (crossing to cygwin incase it might inspire someone) > use nano; for the same reason the (webpage) nano binary uses PDcurses rather than > ncurses so no termcap files are needed. I think the cygwin provided > version of nano is far superior as things like spell check would > actually work, This would be a theory - however since no one has ported and packaged spell to cygwin - it is not yet the (general) case. Regards, Gareth - cygwin nano packager. (PS: Waiting for cgf's supprised look - since nano-devel's Chris complied immediately - or at least is trying too...) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/