Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Corrected: setup.exe beta (testing needed - really!) From: Robert Collins To: Rolf Campbell Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: References: <1048679085.9951.11.camel@localhost> <1048715095.9946.43.camel@localhost> <1048910422.1197.40.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-GFN7vnJ7aDB4clUOJeY6" Organization: Message-Id: <1048968972.1169.170.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 30 Mar 2003 06:16:12 +1000 --=-GFN7vnJ7aDB4clUOJeY6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 03:36, Rolf Campbell wrote: > Well, unistalling that makes this setup work the same as the old setup.=20 > So, does this setup do dependancy analysis different than the old one? > I would guess that this new one tries to install anything that is=20 > depended on and not already installed, where-as the old one only checks=20 > when you are installing the original package? Nope. Both setups check for required and not installed packages. There is simply a bug in the old one. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-GFN7vnJ7aDB4clUOJeY6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+hf8LI5+kQ8LJcoIRAgxnAJwKRtx62FsZ08kJ4XqDJbi2Whz5XgCfeE5Q 0L41z6uLkkQkqa94W6Rv3qI= =HHLF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-GFN7vnJ7aDB4clUOJeY6--