Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Re-setup & cygintl-[12].dll From: Robert Collins To: cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: John Morrison In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-3oETmeq7N34x0sEkk3Bj" Organization: Message-Id: <1048714604.9945.31.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 27 Mar 2003 08:36:45 +1100 --=-3oETmeq7N34x0sEkk3Bj Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 02:20, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote: > > > Just a thought, > > > > It's a good one. Such scripts belong in > > /bin > > or > > /usr/bin > > > > :] > > Rob >=20 > You mean along with ssh-user-config &Co? Any particular reason why this > is any better than already having mkpasswd and mkgroup there? I was answering a general question, and hopefully provoking thought to connected the points. And yes, there is a reason why it would be an improvement in this specific case. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-3oETmeq7N34x0sEkk3Bj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+gh1sI5+kQ8LJcoIRAkokAJ9o3e+bCHrou43JKUUMwzmNdo/MPgCgm55f N+Em07qBb82dNUL/vcd5nSw= =W14E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-3oETmeq7N34x0sEkk3Bj--