Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: New setup.exe snapshot available.
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins@cygwin.com>
To: Hans Horn <hannes@2horns.com>
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <b4l02q$qgj$1@main.gmane.org>
References: <1047169398.25565.11.camel@localhost>
	 <3.0.5.32.20030308230123.007fd7d0@incoming.verizon.net>
	 <b4l02q$qgj$1@main.gmane.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-v/niR0SQ7O3wVccGKXEm"
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1047417896.6109.46.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 12 Mar 2003 08:24:56 +1100

--=-v/niR0SQ7O3wVccGKXEm
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 02:41, Hans Horn wrote:


> A look at setup.ini that was newly created, revealed the following:
>=20
> setup-timestamp: 1047304219
> setup-version: 2.249.2.5
>=20
> Looks like stale cheese, doesn't it?

Not at all. You appear to be making an assumption that is incorrect.

The setup-version there is not the version of setup.exe that you *ran*.
It's the version of setup.exe that is the *minimum* version that can use
the setup.ini file safely.

Rob

--=20
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.

--=-v/niR0SQ7O3wVccGKXEm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+blQoI5+kQ8LJcoIRAgxyAJ9ybLF0xFK2WAv85flY/9qKihYZrgCfaBF0
Tp12hDN/xOne+66Vlp3yL3k=
=avkx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-v/niR0SQ7O3wVccGKXEm--

