Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:12:11 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: mchase@ix.netcom.com, DJ Delorie Subject: Re: clean_setup.pl binary-only cache patch Message-ID: <20030103171211.GA19968@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, mchase@ix.netcom.com, DJ Delorie References: <20030103141927.GB1712@tishler.net> <20030103152502.GA2129@redhat.com> <20030103164611.GG1712@tishler.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030103164611.GG1712@tishler.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 11:46:11AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 10:25:02AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 09:19:27AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: >> >The attached patch enables clean_setup.pl to handle binary-only >> >caches/mirrors. Specifically, when no "source:" tags are in the >> >setup.ini file. >> >[snip] >> >> Wouldn't such a mirror be in violation of the GPL? > >Hmm...good point. OK, I will fess up. I have such a mirror that is >only for the convenience of my co-workers and myself. It is not >distributed outside of our company. Note that I was just trying to save >bandwidth and disk space. > >If this is considered a GPL violation (and in hindsight, it probably >is), then I will update my script to download the source too. Hmm. I'm not sure that this is a GPL violation. I seem to recall something about intra-company stuff like this being ok. I'm Cc'ing DJ since he is my resident expert on GPL issues. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/