Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin@cygwin.com Path: not-for-mail From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: cygwin License related Query.... Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:26:27 -0800 Lines: 18 Message-ID: <3E00CBE3.9070502@cotagesoft.com> References: <4223A04BF7D1B941A25246ADD0462FF55D5463@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> <20021218155657.GD11184@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Christopher Faylor wrote: > Btw, I was trying to move this discussion off of the public list because > it probably isn't of much interest to people there. Well, .. The Red Hat Cygwin Product pages are marvelously content-free when it comes to cost and content (i.e. which version) information. Other mixed-license products (MySQL, etc.) are quite up-front about licensing requirements, costs and versions supported commercially, with exhaustive detail in their web pages. Perhaps Red Hat can be a little more explicit on their pages? -- Shankar. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/