Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: cgf-cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:08:45 +0100 From: thomas Reply-To: thomas X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <44125937.20021211150845@huno.net> To: cgf-cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: pipe improvements in snapshot In-Reply-To: <20021211041250.GA31215@redhat.com> References: <20021211041250.GA31215@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > Please check out the latest snapshot and report here if there are > problems. I haven't yet tried this on Windows 9x class systems so it's > entirely possible that there is a problem there. It seems to work great! I did a few tests and there was no delay anymore whatsoever. I've just sent the dll to someone to try out on a 9x system. One thing about the possible data loss: Is that true data loss, like some bytes won't make it trough the pipe, or will that only result in a delay because the bytes have to be send again? I will do some more thourough tests and will report back. Thanks so far! thomas -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/