Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:21:28 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Cc: jjohnstn@redhat.com
Subject: Re: strtof is missing
Message-ID: <20021205222128.GB2282@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com, jjohnstn@redhat.com
References: <200211240004.04863.jblazi@gmx.de> <177909597.20021124103437@vtc.ru> <20021124105015.X1398@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3DEE5BD8.5000408@redhat.com> <20021205103407.N1140@cygbert.vinschen.de> <1039081042.13185.84.camel@lifelesswks> <20021205145838.GD16892@redhat.com> <3DEFAEE0.7080407@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DEFAEE0.7080407@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 02:54:08PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote:
>Chris,
>
>  Can you clarify.  Do you want me to duplicate the routine or
>stick with the solution I originally presented which is to rename
>the routine and leave a #define that maps the old name to the
>new one.

I think your plan is fine.  I think just renaming the function in newlib
and creating a define to deal with legacy newlib apps is the correct way
to handle this.  We can also make modifications in the cygwin side to
make it transparent to the end user.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

