Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: Ralf Hauser Subject: Re: RFD: cygwin-bug mailing list/bugzilla [was Re: Bug in cvs cygwin1.dll ?] Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:18:19 +0200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <3.0.5.32.20020625225959.0080a290@mail.attbi.com> <20020626031121.GA7492@redhat.com> <3D19D9ED.7080303@netscape.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-62-167-211-178.adslplus.ch Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1034864195 18938 62.167.211.178 (17 Oct 2002 14:16:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:16:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021008 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20020625225959.0080a290@mail.attbi.com> Nicholas Wourms wrote: > [snip] Furthermore, if we were to establish a profile on the > redhat bugzilla, I believe that bug-reporting could be streamlined and > potentially provide more details. At the very least, it would mean less > things for people to remeber to do. I strongly support this because a tool like bugzilla allows for a much better structuring of the bug reports and provides a formal process how such inputs are handled. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/