Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: [Proposal] Moving user mount information to HKLM
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins@cygwin.com>
To: Dan Vasaru <dvasaru@broadpark.no>
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <CHEDKHJJDLOCCOFLMGEAEEMICMAA.dvasaru@broadpark.no>
References: <CHEDKHJJDLOCCOFLMGEAEEMICMAA.dvasaru@broadpark.no>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-FtrfIjc81mvsqSCncuhC"
Date: 28 Sep 2002 00:57:35 +1000
Message-Id: <1033138655.22922.312.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-FtrfIjc81mvsqSCncuhC
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 00:57, Dan Vasaru wrote:
>=20
> Robert,
>=20
> Your solution only works if the users are local administrators, as a doma=
in
> user has no rights to HKLM  (and hence to create a system mount). In our
> case, giving all users local administrator rights is an acceptable soluti=
on,
> but we're still left with a maximum of 25-30 simultaneous users. But we'l=
l
> go with it while waiting for a better mount.
>=20
> Thanks, Dan.

Excellent, I'm glad you have a workaround.

FWIW the HKLM user mounts would have the same security ramification
(which is why it's not a generically viable solution).

Rob

--=-FtrfIjc81mvsqSCncuhC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9lHHeI5+kQ8LJcoIRAqWkAJ4okyCc7CigqwXyzTswPJQ+/SwP/gCcD5+G
0ONlHjDZLZHoJCi+sZ0DjfU=
=P+7t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-FtrfIjc81mvsqSCncuhC--