Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Emil Briggs To: Ross Smith Subject: Re: limit for # of items created with "new" ? Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 22:39:49 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <79218202D4B9D4118A290002A508E13B79C39A@PNZEXCHANGE> In-Reply-To: <79218202D4B9D4118A290002A508E13B79C39A@PNZEXCHANGE> Organization: Baymountain, Inc. Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200209242239.49861.emil@baymountain.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g8P2dax01712 On Tuesday 24 September 2002 10:28 pm, Ross Smith wrote: > From: Hans Horn [mailto:hannes@2horns.com] > > > // an element of a linked list > > typedef struct node { > > node (int _v, node* _n) : v(_v), next(_n) {} > > int v; > > node* next; > > }; > > I'm surprised that compiled; the typedef shouldn't be there. > > > int main (int argc, char** argv) { > > // allocate descriptions of points > > char** points = new char*[NUM_POINTS]; assert(points); > > The assert is superfluous; new is guaranteed never to return null. > Except when you are out of memory. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/