Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: RE: Setup window size: a suggestion From: Robert Collins To: cygwin@cygwin.com Cc: "Gary R. Van Sickle" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nCYmcKVq+S5SW55i1kFW" Date: 09 Sep 2002 08:18:56 +1000 Message-Id: <1031523536.9686.60.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-nCYmcKVq+S5SW55i1kFW Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2002-09-09 at 04:14, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > But isn't that exactly what my suggestion will allow to avoid? If the > window size is pre-selected (in fact, with a command-line option, you may > even know it before any windows are created), dynamic resizing is not an > issue. The window will still be non-resizeable, but will have a differen= t > (fixed) size depending on the option. This could possibly be accomplishe= d > by having multiple property sheet definitions and choosing the correct on= e > at run-time (I'm not too up-to-date on windows programming, so please > correct me if I'm wrong). We have command line option support, so adding a integer pair grabber isn't a big deal. I'll let Gary answer as to the overhead multiple window defs would incur (He's the w32 GUI wizzard :] ).=20 I suspect that knowing the size in advance doesn't help much, as we still have the resizing logic to manage on all the pages. Cheers, Rob --=-nCYmcKVq+S5SW55i1kFW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9e8zQI5+kQ8LJcoIRAr78AJ94SkRk4A1tdWCoPjajw3CWABXyJQCdF8P4 YVBY4u6Gg2lAe8pkrE911L8= =XvT8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nCYmcKVq+S5SW55i1kFW--