Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: "Hans Horn" Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin Subject: gcc3.2 vs gcc2.95 - devolution never stops Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 15:17:47 -0700 Lines: 22 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: p1.almaden.ibm.com X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030572773 27283 198.4.83.52 (28 Aug 2002 22:12:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 22:12:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 List, I just upgraded my old cygwin inst from february (1.3.10) to the latest (1.3.12.?) and am utterly displeased with what was done to gcc and the libs that come with it. none of my code compiles any more (due to missing ostream::form(), R.I.P.). reverting back to the "old" compiler (using gcc-2 instead of gcc), however, doesn't link because refs to ostream::endl, ostream::operator<<, and such are undefined. Please tell me that I am doing something terribly stupid! Hans p.s. taking away ostream::form() w/o replacement almost feels like a stunt Micro$oft would have done to its developers -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/