Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 11:26:23 +0100 From: Jim George To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Top reporting on cygwin processes only? Message-Id: <20020806112623.2950e6f5.jim.george@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20020806095533.O3921@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <20020805223042.39e9de67.jim.george@blueyonder.co.uk> <20020806095533.O3921@cygbert.vinschen.de> Organization: JSDM Services Ltd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 09:55:33 +0200 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 07:10:50PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > P.S. Top walks the process table in the same way ps does. It shouldn't > > No. ps uses the Cygwin API, top uses /proc. /proc only contains Cygwin > processes. > > Corinna > Questions then... should ps be modified to work as top does, of course /proc would need to be upgraded, or can top be modified to work as ps does, or should both continue on their own but be updated to recognise all processes running on a box? Jim -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/