Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: List administrivia From: Robert Collins To: Samuel Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: <015901c23b4e$3414ee30$a352a518@samsystem> References: <20020803115620.54661.qmail@web21010.mail.yahoo.com> <015901c23b4e$3414ee30$a352a518@samsystem> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-rNaCtnXrdIYkFzc9yiqR" Date: 04 Aug 2002 10:34:26 +1000 Message-Id: <1028421266.8966.144.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-rNaCtnXrdIYkFzc9yiqR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 10:30, Samuel wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nicholas Wourms" > To: > Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 4:56 AM > Subject: Re: List administrivia >=20 >=20 > > This list doesn't engage in Reply-To: munging. >=20 >=20 > Yes, the list does not. >=20 > I am not sure I understand what "munging" is but some list members do use > "Reply-To" in their headers. Munging in this context refers to the list server making changes, as opposed to an individual choosing a reply-to: of their own choice. Rob --=-rNaCtnXrdIYkFzc9yiqR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1MdpIACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoKpIQCdFKKLUbKO0IcNisiAevcc5QAJ 21sAoNTQMruKrXRkkKaaRqTagDGpp9iu =GcuH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-rNaCtnXrdIYkFzc9yiqR--