Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: GCC 3.x Binaries From: Robert Collins To: "Peuser, Mike" Cc: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" In-Reply-To: <0E3BC6B0EE47D611AC2400034799FB7122E719@OLTEX640> References: <0E3BC6B0EE47D611AC2400034799FB7122E719@OLTEX640> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Frq0J5FOAZ+UVgZILtxK" Date: 01 Aug 2002 10:41:20 +1000 Message-Id: <1028162480.2788.577.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-Frq0J5FOAZ+UVgZILtxK Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 10:21, Peuser, Mike wrote: > Is there a plan to update the Cygwin Net Release process to provide GCC 3= .x binaries instead of the 2.95.x ones? If so, > where can I find this plan? I think you've got us confused with an IT shop with formal methodologies. Try searching google for "GCC 3 cygwin Chris Faylor" and you'll get lots of useful references. The short version: gcc 3.x is coming real soon now. Rob --=-Frq0J5FOAZ+UVgZILtxK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1Ig7AACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoKViwCfcihW5W6z4rz7SZIJOwabCICD +1sAniegZlehgKUxWZlVA7JGHRdGGF/B =tiOQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Frq0J5FOAZ+UVgZILtxK--