Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: FAQ or bash bug with ntsec? (WAS: Help request: bash with PAT H
	problems)
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins@cygwin.com>
To: Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <20020730113720.GB1916@tishler.net>
References: <1264BCF4F426D611B0B00050DA782A50027EFF9F@mail.gft.com>
	<20020730125100.D3921@cygbert.vinschen.de> 
	<20020730113720.GB1916@tishler.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-i3taDaR+zN1UPWuRhrFu"
Date: 30 Jul 2002 21:51:13 +1000
Message-Id: <1028029873.688.4.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-i3taDaR+zN1UPWuRhrFu
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 21:37, Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > What I don't understand, though, is, why the permissions are set to
> > that value by setup.exe.  I thought it should give explicitely full
> > permissions to world.  At least I recall that I added some code to
> > setup.exe setting the security descriptor.  Is it not used in setup
> > anymore???
>=20
> Someone on the pgsql-cygwin list had the same problem with postgres.exe.
> After helping him, I ask him to determine why the permissions were only
> set to "-rwx------".  Unfortunately, he never reported back.  Could it
> be that users are setting "Install For" to "Just Me"?

WAG time. NTFS with windows 2000 or XP and an inherited ACL that
interferes.

Rob


--=-i3taDaR+zN1UPWuRhrFu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEABECAAYFAj1GfbEACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoLNnACfWOQ1zt9d8+dn97W359+S53IX
YqQAoMD2jBrGJkvxedWVkmBKfmnBjniM
=1MzE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-i3taDaR+zN1UPWuRhrFu--