Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Setup snapshot v.2.259.2.4 : source files From: Robert Collins To: fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com In-Reply-To: <000901c23704$5b615ee0$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk> References: <000901c23704$5b615ee0$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gWLF9Zb0jtj1SOtRNaRp" Date: 29 Jul 2002 23:40:04 +1000 Message-Id: <1027950005.4869.1.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-gWLF9Zb0jtj1SOtRNaRp Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 23:32, fergus@bonhard.uklinux.net wrote: > Should the file > http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.259.2.4.tar.bz2 be renamed > http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.259.2.4-src.tar.bz2 ? Fergu= s No. It's a snapshot of the source code, not a source package. Source package naming BTW would be setup-2.259.2.4-1-src.tar.bz2. Rob --=-gWLF9Zb0jtj1SOtRNaRp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1FRbQACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoKrMQCeJkGJr6s94ZFM3nR5rVW+xD/q TBIAnR+36w9+FuG/kpq/dovVXMzsWz/B =782D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gWLF9Zb0jtj1SOtRNaRp--