Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: Scott Evans Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin Subject: status of stat() ? Date: 08 Jul 2002 16:02:01 -0400 Lines: 15 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 209-19-232-50.customer.algx.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026158477 3429 209.19.232.50 (8 Jul 2002 20:01:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 20:01:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp (Windows [1])) A couple months ago there were a few patches suggested to improve the performance of stat() calls. Here's one: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg01600.html I haven't seen any results from these patches -- searched the mailing list and still nothing. Just curious if anyone's looked at them, considered them, etc. I'd love to see stat() operations get faster (but I don't have time to dig into the code myself at the moment, so I know I'm not in a position to ask much). -- scott evans :: www.antisleep.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/