Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 12:08:18 -0400 From: Jason Tishler Subject: Re: Rebase 1.5-1: Causes invalid page fault In-reply-to: <20020619141344.91529.qmail@web21006.mail.yahoo.com> To: Nicholas Wourms Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Mail-followup-to: Nicholas Wourms , cygwin@cygwin.com Message-id: <20020627160818.GA1276@tishler.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i References: <20020618201729.GB2064@tishler.net> <20020619141344.91529.qmail@web21006.mail.yahoo.com> Nicholas, On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 07:13:44AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > I am beginning to think that rebasing dll's isn't necessary for WinME/9x, > due to the differences in memory management. I only say this because in > the doco's from Microsoft ReBase.exe is referred to as the NT DLL Rebase > Tool. Are you sure? Because the MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/debug/imagehlp_1hut.asp states that ReBaseImage() is available on Windows 95/98/Me. Additionally, the MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/tools/perfutil_2z39.asp does *not* indicate that rebase.exe is for NT only. > Anyhow, here is what I get with sdk rebase: > > REBASE: *** RelocateImage failed (cygbz21.0.dll). Image may be corrupted > > Any thoughts on this? Maybe your cygbz21.0.dll was already corrupted? Please try again with a known good one from the tarball. Use file to verify that the DLL is OK before trying to rebase. Thanks, Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/