Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <000701c21190$9a301380$af7b1f3e@Fergus> Reply-To: From: To: Cc: Subject: New setup.exe v.2.249.2.2 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 22:40:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Both http://cygwin.com/setup.exe and http://cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.249.2.2.exe come up with v.2.249.2.2 as their ID when they are started, but their md5sum's are different. Is the first-named the later version and therefore the one to try? I've tried them both under W98/SE. Unless setup-2.218.2.9-1.src.tar.gz is Skip'd, I still get "Download incomplete..." followed by "Can't open (null) ..." followed by "Installation incomplete. Check /setup.log.full ...". If it is Skip'd, things look just fine. (For me, all the recent afflictions with setup.exe were subsequent to, and seem to me to be consequent to, this offering.) Fergus -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/