Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020610120352.04c79318@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender: lhall@pop.ma.ultranet.com
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 12:05:30 -0400
To: Thomas Baker <thomas.baker@bi.fhg.de>
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall@rfk.com>
Subject: Re: Mailcap and Cygwin/Mutt 1.2.5i
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
In-Reply-To: <20020610175315.A2164@mail.gmd.de>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020610104439.04c869a0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
 <20020609114821.A2224@LEPIDUS>
 <20020607145647.A160@LEPIDUS>
 <20020607133143.GB1408@NBOF>
 <20020607162934.D1872@LEPIDUS>
 <20020607150006.GB604@NBOF>
 <20020609114821.A2224@LEPIDUS>
 <20020610110850.A2132@mail.gmd.de>
 <5.1.0.14.0.20020610104439.04c869a0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 11:53 AM 6/10/2002, Thomas Baker wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:45:56AM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>> At 05:09 AM 6/10/2002, Thomas Baker wrote:
>> >2) A weakly related question: My .fetchmailrc is supposed to
>> >   have permissions of 710 "at a maximum", but chmod 710
>> >   .fetchmailrc (under Cygwin) doesn't seem to change the
>> >   permissions at all.
>> 
>> See:
>> Why doesn't chmod work?
>> http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_4.html#SEC45
>
>Hmm, I see...  The recommendation in SEC45, when a workaround
>is required, is to modify the application's source code.
>Perhaps this would need to be done for a Cygwin build of
>Fetchmail so that it wouldn't make this unmeetable demand?


Absolutely, in order to handle this for 9x platforms.  As you can see, 
this issue isn't a new one.  It's just awaiting someone interested enough
in it to patch it.


>> >3) Another WRQ: On the first tries, procmail delivers mail
>> >   without From-lines, and I figured out that this has
>> >   something to do with the %F and %T "escapes" but have not
>> >   found any documentation on these things at all (other than a
>> >   "man fetchmail" warning that they are potentially unsafe).
>> 
>> Check the email archives for this one.  It was discussed in the last
>> few weeks.
>
>Bingo.  (The search engine didn't like "%F", so I downloaded
>the last six months of postings and fgrep'd; figured I'd need
>to consult them anyway...:-)
>
>Thank you!


You're welcome.



Larry Hall                              lhall@rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

