Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 08:18:15 +0100
Message-ID: <7344-Fri17May2002081815+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
From: David Starks-Browning <starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Jim George" <jim.george@blueyonder.co.uk>
Cc: "Cygwin" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: two installs one works; one doesn't
In-Reply-To: <00ae01c1fd1c$72a0b190$23b5fea9@GEORGE.CO.UK>
References: <00ae01c1fd1c$72a0b190$23b5fea9@GEORGE.CO.UK>

On Thursday 16 May 02, Jim George writes:
> I have cygwin, cygwin-xfree, and postgres installed on two Win2K systems.
> The first is a W2K Professional on a Toshiba Laptop, the second is a W2K
> Advanced Server on a desktop.
> 
> The first works like grease lightening, the second runs like a dog in xfree
> and postgres (indeed I can't even run initDB).

Both have the same anti-virus software setup?

I notice massive performance differences depending on which product I
use and how it's configured.

David


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

