Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com
Message-ID: <3CE49442.8050409@elegant.nl>
Date:   Fri, 17 May 2002 07:25:22 +0200
From: Gilgamesh Nootebos <Gilgamesh.Nootebos@elegant.nl>
Reply-To: cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Organization: The Elegant Group
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417
X-Accept-Language: nl, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: umount doesn't umount
References: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C60EE@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> ':'s on NTFS allow alternate streams. Read up on that before
> speculating, and please remember that a single test case (your local
> test) only shows the results for that exact configuration.
> 

I just refreshed my memory with 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/fsys_7qwj.asp 
and 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/fsys_5okz.asp 
which confirmed what I suspected and you say: NTFS might allow it but 
Windows doesn't.

That is why I mentioned my systems specification with the testcase. I 
just forgot to say it was really NTFS and not FAT32 that's used.

Gilgamesh

-- 
Gilgamesh Nootebos (Elegant Relational Development)
@: Gilgamesh.Nootebos@elegant.nl
T: +31 36 54 77 100


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

