Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin@cygwin.com Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:30:34 +0000 From: Marc Chantreux To: "Gerrit P. Haase" Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: fetchmail still corrupts files ? Message-ID: <20020417123034.A1588@MILLENIUM> References: <187370369322.20020416162553@familiehaase.de> <20020417064038.A1480@MILLENIUM> <8438599843.20020417112304@familiehaase.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <8438599843.20020417112304@familiehaase.de>; from freeweb@nyckelpiga.de on Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:23:04AM +0200 On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:23:04AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > no , it's not ! i've already posted that *fetchmail* has a *known bug* > > when dealing with the W2K winsock. > > Is it really just a problem with W2K? > I had these problems too before I upgraded to W2K on NT4. > Now my fetchmail runs on our server (NT4), no problems here. peraps i've misunderstood while reading the archive : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-03/msg00053.html (and follow-ups) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00628.html > > One simple test succeeds (Sending with Mutt through the sendmail > emulator of my mail server and fetched with Fetchmail). > > Second try sending with Mutt through ssmtp and fetched with Fetchmail > was also successful. > > I'm running fetchmail as service (latest release version) on Cygwin > 1.3.10 on a NT4 SP6a box. Compiled on the same box. i'm really interested fetchmail do works well but i don't know test fetchmail without procmail. Marc -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/